DJI Founder Frank Wang - The Boy Who Wanted to Fly Helicopters and Built a Drone Empire
- Kachun To
- vor 21 Minuten
- 13 Min. Lesezeit
This blog explores what distinguishes innovative Chinese tech companies and their leaders as global pioneers. Its goal is to distill entrepreneurial, strategic, and managerial insights that anyone can learn from. This blog does not conduct a 360° examination, it takes on the perspective of the author as an entrepreneur and businessman to distill lessons we can adopt. As with all individuals and entities who have accumulated wealth and power, there is a wider societal and moral impact associated with their success. However, these aspects will not be my focus.
Today we shed a light on DJI founder Frank Wang.
Frank Wang (汪滔) has built a drone empire with a global market share of 70%. His company, DJI, is so far ahead of its competitors that despite geopolitical and security concerns, the US has not banned its products. They’re simply too good and too widely used.
But 20 years ago, when Frank crashed his first model helicopter, no one would have guessed he would become the creator of the first Chinese company to be the undisputed global technology leader in its industry.

In fact, by conventional wisdom, Frank Wang should not have succeeded let alone become a billionaire:
- He was a mediocre student and dropped out of his first college.
- He believes most people in the world are stupid and incompetent.
- He wanted to turn his hobby into a business.
- His perfectionism and difficult personality drove many people away.
Yet, defying conventions is exactly what enabled him to build DJI
So, what made Frank Wang successful?
Pursuing a Childhood Dream: Model Helicopters
Frank Wang has always been a dreamer. Deeply inspired by a childhood comic book where the protagonist flew around the world in a red helicopter, he wanted nothing more than his own model helicopter.
He was a mediocre student, but his parents promised to buy him one if he got good grades. He studied hard, and when he finally succeeded, they rewarded him with the toy he had longed for. His first flight ended in catastrophe. He crashed it immediately. Back then, model helicopters were notoriously difficult to control, requiring countless crashes before mastering their handling.
That experience marked him for life. From then on, he wanted to build a model helicopter that anyone could fly with ease.
Since no degree program aligned with his dream, he enrolled in electrical engineering at East China Normal University, a major he thought was close enough. But he soon realized his studies had nothing to do with building flying gadgets.
So, he dropped out in his third year and applied to top schools like MIT and Stanford only to be rejected by all. Only the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) accepted him into their electrical engineering and computer science program.
Even there, no courses covered unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). But Frank did everything possible to learn the necessary technology, participating in extracurriculars like robotics competitions. His team won first prize in Hong Kong and third in the Asia-Pacific region in the ABU Robocon.
For his 2005 graduation thesis, instead of choosing a topic provided by the faculty, he proposed building an easy-to-use control system for model helicopters. Professors rejected the idea, deeming it too complex—it required mastery of multiple engineering disciplines. The number of variables (orientation, location, speed) was overwhelming for an undergrad.
Undeterred, Frank convinced two classmates—also UAV enthusiasts—to join him. The professor finally relented, even though the solution was something even professional engineers hadn’t cracked. He granted them 18,000 HKD in funding.
The trio poured every waking hour into the project. On presentation day, Frank’s helicopter soared—but it couldn’t stabilize, bobbing uncontrollably before crashing in front of the professors and students.
He passed with a C.

What seemed like a failure became the turning point of his life. Professor Li Zexiang (李泽湘), who would become Frank’s pivotal mentor, saw something most academics missed: his perseverance, innovation, and execution.
The botched presentation only fueled Frank’s passion. His team kept refining the control system, and by January 2006, they had cracked it—enabling smooth, stable flight and landing. He had finally built his "red helicopter."
Out of curiosity, Frank posted his results on a model plane forum, offering the system for 50,000 CNY (~7,000 USD). To his surprise, buyers were willing to pay—even though production cost only 15,000 CNY (2,000 USD). Spotting a business opportunity, he excitedly founded a company with his two teammates.
In March 2006, DJI was born, with Frank’s modest goal: "If I can feed a team of 10-20 people with this, that would be great."
At the time, UAVs weren’t plug-and-play; they were a hobbyist market. So DJI focused on selling components, especially control systems. Frank and his friends moved to Shenzhen, renting a 20-square-meter storage room with 200,000 CNY (~28,000 USD) from his parents.
These were the humble beginnings of what would become a billion-dollar empire.
The First Years Were Brutal
Recruiting talent was tough. As a small, unknown company with a shabby office and low salaries, DJI couldn’t attract experienced hires. Frank had to train everyone from scratch.
Compensation was modest, but his demands were sky-high. Obsessed with product improvement, he often worked through the night—and expected his team to do the same. If he had a new idea, he’d call them at any hour.
A perfectionist, Frank gave excruciatingly detailed instructions—like how to tighten each of the hundreds of screws on a helicopter. His specs were vague ("turn with two fingers, this much force"), based on experience rather than quantifiable metrics. Structurally critical screws needed to be tight or sealed, but since users frequently disassembled UAVs, others had to be easily removable.
Such demands stressed his team immensely.
He also ignored their input. In a Forbes interview, he admitted that early on, he offered shares to his three employees, but unevenly based on "personal contribution." Everyone was unhappy: the one with fewer shares felt cheated and quit, while the one with more asked if he could gift some to the others. Frank refused: "No, you take more. At this company, I’m in charge."
This is the classic story of someone turning a hobby into a business with no leadership experience. Unsurprisingly, by 2007, his entire team—including co-founders—had quit, leaving only one dispatch employee. Worse, a former employee stole his designs and started selling them. Frank wanted to sue but couldn’t afford the 70,000 CNY (~10.000USD) lawyer fee.
With his dream on the brink of collapse, he sought out Professor Li, waiting outside his classroom for two hours. After hearing Frank’s predicament, Li didn’t just offer advice—he gave 70,000 CNY immediately and looped in Professor Zhu Xiaorui (朱晓蕊) from the Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), funding DJI with a combined investment of 1 million CNY (~140.000 USD). Even better, Li’s first batch of robotics PhD students were graduating, and he steered many toward DJI. He also became DJI’s chairman.
With capital, top talent, and a seasoned chairman, DJI finally had the resources to break through.
Reflecting on this, Frank’s company nearly collapsed due to his own mistakes—only to be saved by his professor. He got very lucky.

For context, Professor Li isn’t your average academic. Born in 1961, he was among the first Chinese students to study robotics in the US during the 1980s. At Carnegie Mellon and Berkeley, he saw firsthand the innovation gap between China and the US.
In an interview with LatePost (晚点), he said: "China’s demographic dividend and latecomer advantage will run out. We must shift from copying to leading in technology."
Returning to China in 1992, he joined the newly established HKUST. Seeing the disconnect between academia and business, he designed curricula that pushed students to apply theory to real-world problems. To bridge the gap, he founded Googol Technology, focusing on motion control and intelligent manufacturing. Simultaneously, he set up robotics labs at HKUST and HIT, fostering a model of integrated learning and innovation.
He has backed many student entrepreneurs with funding, advice, and connections—many failed.
Attaining Technological Dominance
With resources secured, Frank could finally execute his vision. UAVs have three key components:
1. Flight control
2. Gimbal (camera stabilizer)
3. Video transmission
Video transmission was complex and low-demand, so DJI outsourced it. They focused everything on flight control and gimbals.
Frank’s dream was to give others the joy of flying UAVs effortlessly. But smooth, stable control during flight and hovering remained a massive challenge. High-precision sensors were needed to manage orientation, position, and speed. UAVs had to withstand turbulence and magnetic interference, requiring robust error-correction systems. Complex flight models had to be developed for advanced maneuvers.
Now, with top engineers, DJI embarked on endless trial-and-error cycles—and countless crashes. They collaborated deeply with suppliers to create seamless sensor integration.
By 2009, they cracked it: the XP3.1 flight control system, enabling effortless flight. The UAV could even stabilize without user input. To prove its reliability, Frank and Prof. Li took it to Mount Everest, filming the first-ever drone footage of the peak. The video went viral in the UAV community.

Orders poured in—20 units/month at 20,000 CNY each. The XP3.1 stabilized DJI’s finances.
Next, they revolutionized the gimbal.
At the time, gimbals were mechanical, resulting in shaky footage. DJI developed a brushless DC motor gimbal for ultra-smooth stabilization—an industry "impossibility." Frank admitted in an interview that he ignored business logic: his goal was simply to build an awesome product he’d enjoy. The engineering challenge excited him. It took three years to harmonize sensors, flight control, and gimbal movements for steady footage.
Then came a market-changing insight: An Australian distributor noted that while flight controls sold 20 units/month, gimbals sold 200. Most buyers mounted them on multi-rotor UAVs, not single-rotor helicopters. Frank immediately pivoted. By September 2011, DJI launched the Wookong multi-rotor control system—a hit thanks to its unmatched stability.
By 2010, the UAV market was crowded, with bigger players. But DJI’s tech was leagues ahead. Competitors’ drones were shaky; DJI’s weren’t.
In 2012, they released the Zenmuse Z15 the first brushless motor gimbal—revolutionizing aerial filming. DJI now offered best-in-class components
Their tech disrupted the filming industry. What once required a 100,000USD helicopter shoot now cost 10,000USD. Revenue surpassed 100 million CNY (~14 million USD). But this was just the beginning.
Mainstream Breakthrough: The Phantom
Back then, UAVs were for hobbyists—most required assembly. This kept mainstream consumers away.
After six years of R&D, DJI had the tech to build their own drone. They poured everything into the Phantom 1—the first consumer-grade, plug-and-play drone, priced at just $1,000.

Frank clarified in an interview: "Consumer-grade" didn’t mean cheap; it meant high quality at an accessible price. The Phantom flew so smoothly that even beginners could use it.
Frank had done what Apple did for smartphones: he made drones mainstream. Even Bill Gates and Steve Wozniak bought—and loved—the Phantom. Sales projections were 3,000 units/month. They sold over 10,000 in the first month. Overnight, drones went from niche to mass-market. DJI became the undisputed leader with 70% global share.
This was unprecedented: most Chinese companies dominated domestically first before going global. DJI went straight to global dominance.
Maturing as a Leader
Let’s pause. A dreamer turned his hobby into a business with zero experience. His flaws nearly destroyed the company—until a mentor saved him. Then, in just years, he dominated globally. How?
Frank succeeded by staying true to himself—while maturing just enough.
His biggest flaw was his leadership style. He never stopped being demanding, but he learned to harness talent effectively.
High standards remained: He’d openly call subpar work "rubbish." Overtime was normal. His office door read: “只带脑子,不带情绪” "Leave your emotions—only brains inside."
But he empowered talent: Titles didn’t matter. Great ideas got resources. For example, an intern came up with a clever idea to solve the Phantom’s gimbal issue —and got to lead a team to execute it
Generous rewards: Top performers received recognition and bonus, like BMWs or Teslas.
He admitted in an interview: "Maybe I lack empathy—I’ve never been an employee." He even considered working for someone else to understand their perspective.
Frank wasn’t a likable boss, but he found a system that worked. As one employee said: "It’s good to keep a certain distance from Frank."
The lesson? You don’t need to be a perfect leader. You need a system that works for you.
Business Strategy: Staying True to the Dream
Frank’s goal was always his "red helicopter." Early on, DJI sold components, including to government clients—a lucrative but boring market. In an interview, Frank stated: “I want to make a great product. These [government] customers don’t align with what I want to achieve.” For a financially struggling startup, walking away from easy money wasn’t simple, but Frank refused to compromise.
Later, when multi-rotor drones surged in demand, he pivoted instantly because it aligned with his vision of building revolutionary products. The shift made strategic sense, but for Frank, it was never just business: it was about pursuing his childhood dream at scale.
With the Phantom, the initial plan was purely defensive: block competitors with a low-cost product. He didn’t even expect to make profits from it. But true to his quality standards he built a 1,000 USD drone with superior tech, intuitive controls, and sleek design. The result was the “iPhone of drones”: a simple, joyful product that created an entire consumer market. And Drones became economical for agriculture, emergency services, and more applications that were unthinkable before DJI.
It’s a rare case of a hobbyist niche exploding into a billion-dollar industry. Frank never planned for this scale; he just built products he loved. One could retroactively call it a “tech moat strategy”—dominate a niche, then expand mainstream—but that’s hindsight. There was no guarantee a mass market existed. Frank simply followed his dream, seized opportunities without compromising, and had the luck to do the right thing at the right time.
We do not know how much Professor Li’s chairmanship shaped Frank’s growth. No public statements detail his influence, but a seasoned mentor like Li likely tempered Frank’s rougher edges while guiding DJI’s strategy. Regardless, Li’s capital and recruitment support alone were pivotal. Without him, DJI would have failed.
Growing to a Billion-Dollar Company
After the Phantom 1 launch in 2013, DJI didn't rest on its laurels. Until 2016, they released new models almost yearly, widening their technological lead. Between 2009 and 2014 revenues tripled or quadrupled each year as drones became ubiquitous.
More films and music videos used DJI drones, while consumers flew them for fun. In 2015, DJI made headlines when a drunk man crashed a drone on the White House lawn—proof of how mainstream drones had become. Recognizing the security implications, DJI proactively established no-fly zones in its software for critical infrastructure and government areas, self-regulating before governments could intervene.

Today, DJI remains an industry behemoth with billions in revenue and over 70% global market share. Hawkish U.S. politicians have tried banning DJI drones over security concerns, as they did with Huawei, but to no avail.
The resistance to banning DJI reveals its entrenched position:
Firefighters, construction firms, and agricultural businesses rely heavily on DJI's installed base
Switching would be prohibitively expensive for these industries
No competitor matches DJI's product superiority and best-in-class service
Product Quality as a Moral Imperative
It is obvious that DJI’s dominance relies mainly on its technological edge. Frank's difficult personality traits—perfectionism, stubbornness, and contrarian thinking—became DJI's unlikely advantages. What made him a challenging boss also drove the company's technological dominance.
Frank operates by what he calls the DJI Conjecture:"人恶没有大智慧,心邪做事不靠谱"("Evil has no true intelligence, and doesn't produce reliable results")
He explains:
Good people seek truth and create mutual value
Cutting corners for selfish gain is "evil"—no truly intelligent person would do it
Real intelligence creates win-win situations
Complementing this, DJI's walls display the motto:"激极尽志,求真品诚"("Be passionate and dedicated, seek truth and be honest")
For Frank, great products are an ethical duty, whereas offering inferior quality is an evil deed. There's an almost childlike purity to how DJI equates technological excellence with moral goodness. This mindset led them to solve "impossible" engineering challenges—not by accepting conventional wisdom, but by relentlessly pursuing truth.
National Pride in Chinese Innovation
Frank bristles when international partners praise DJI as "different from other Chinese companies." While meant as a compliment, he hears the stereotype that Chinese products and Chinese people are somehow “2nd class” and not of high quality.
This cuts deep because its not only a view foreigners hold, even Chinese consumers prefer foreign products for critical uses (like medical equipment).
When asked if he'd ever downplay DJI's Chinese origins for better branding, Frank refused: "Could you pretend to be something you’re not? Even if you could, you wouldn’t be living the life you want." For him, DJI represents a chance to redeem China's manufacturing reputation from the "evil" of cutthroat companies that chase quick profits with shoddy goods and dirty tricks.
Reinterpreting "Leave Your Emotions"
The sign on Frank's office—"Leave your emotions, only brains inside"—might seem cold. But understood through his philosophy, it can be interpreted as:"Cast aside distractions to focus on truth and solutions."
This doesn't mean Frank lacks emotions. He's intensely passionate about his vision—so much so that empathizing with others doesn't come naturally. These traits alienate people but also fuel DJI's dominance.
Harnessing Flaws as Strengths
On paper, Frank’s flaws—perfectionism, stubbornness, defiance of norms—should have doomed him. Instead, they drove DJI’s success.
But this isn’t a simple "flaws can be good" parable. The real lessons are far more nuanced:
1. Not All Flaws Are Created Equal
A leader must ruthlessly assess whether a "flaw" actually serves their mission.
In DJI’s case, Frank’s obsessiveness drove technological supremacy
In a relationship-driven industry (e.g., hospitality), these same traits might have been catastrophicThe key question: Does this trait create value in your specific context? If not, it’s dead weight.
2. Even Useful Flaws Need Guardrails
Frank didn’t just lean into his harshness, he adapted and built systems to compensate:
High standards stayed, but he added BMW/Tesla rewards for exceptional work
Micromanaging eased as he learned to empower talent (like the intern who solved the gimbal crisis)
Blunt criticism remained, but he created a culture where it’s part of the truth and solution seeking process
3. Luck Matters – But So Does Leveraging It
Frank’s story isn’t pure meritocracy:
Without Prof. Li’s 1Million CNY lifeline and talent pipeline, DJI would have collapsed. Many don’t get second chances to correct their mistakes
Yet most who get second chances still squander them—Frank adapted while staying true to his vision
The Ultimate Takeaway
Entrepreneurs don’t need to erase every flaw. They need to harness the right ones.
Keep what drives your competitive edge
Mitigate what sabotages your team
Pray for luck to get a second chance when you fuck up
Frank Wang isn't a perfect leader, but he's the perfect leader for DJI.
If there’s a Chinese entrepreneur, executive, or company you’d like to learn more about, feel free to reach out!
Comments